Application orchestration refers to the automation of workflows that coordinate and manage communications and requests between application services and/or databases.
Cloud native applications typically rely on containers and microservices as part of their architecture, which comes with the burden of managing calls between services. This cloud architecture approach, while manually manageable, achieves better system efficiencies if automated.
Automation differs from orchestration in its scope. Automations are designed to be single tasks that are easily and quickly completed by machine. Whereas, orchestrations are workflow automations made up of these building block automations. In this, automation and orchestration are closely related but different concepts.
Application orchestration overlaps container orchestration, and is often used interchangeably. To clarify, orchestration in the sense of corralling automations workflows together is used in many computing domains, including “container orchestration”. Container orchestration is the practice and processes of organizing containers and allocating resources to them at scale. This differs from containerization software, such as Docker, which creates and acts as a container’s runtime. Container orchestration software typically coordinates several virtual and physical machines each with their own containerization software installed.
There are several vendor application orchestration platforms, each with their specific algorithm for orchestrating data. For a basic working model, the following is a brief description of Oracle’s Communication Service Broker, which performed application orchestration.
For Oracle, “orchestration is the ability of Service Broker (SB) to route a session through various applications.” This means that the SB acts as traffic controller, routing sessions sequentially from one application execution to the next until the session control is passed back to the network entity. This works in three stages:
Application orchestration requires integration. Depending on the application, perhaps deep integrations. It is always advisable, when working with vendor platforms, to consult a product specialist to determine if it will meet current and future needs.
Automations chained together in orchestrated workflows provide several benefits, mostly all, though, improve the efficiency of operations.
Netflix deploys multiple containers using its open source container orchestration systems called Titus. Netflix uses a lot of containers, launching as many as 3 million every week. Managing all of the services within these containers, let alone the communication between them, is simply mind-bogglingly impossible without automation and orchestration software.
So, why does Netflix choose application and container orchestration? Simply, it wouldn’t be possible otherwise. Application orchestration helps to improve efficiency by leveraging automations. It also makes what we know as the cloud, and cloud services possible.
Container, or application, orchestration platforms can be found for every major cloud provider. However, many of them are based on the popular open-source container orchestration software Kubernetes. The following are some of the most familiar names in container cloud services.
Kubernetes is open-source, and largely considered the gold standard for container orchestration, though, as stated above, and because it is highly portable, there are many vendors to choose from that can accommodate it. Kubernetes is highly flexible and used in the delivery of complex applications. Docker container orchestration, or Docker Swarm, is Docker’s flavor of orchestration software that is included with Docker. Both are solid and effective solutions for massively scaling deployments, as well as implementation and management.
● Kubernetes focus on high demand use cases with complex configurations,
● Docker Swarm prompts ease of use and simple and quick deployed use cases
The following table highlights several comparisons between the two.
|
Docker Swarm |
Kubernetes |
App Definition & Deployment |
Desired state definition in YAML file |
Desired State definition |
Autoscaling |
No autoscaling possible |
Cluster autoscaling, horizontal pod autoscaling |
Availability |
Service replication at Swarm Node level |
Stacked Control Plane node with load balancing either inside or outside the cluster |
Cloud Support |
Azure |
AWS, Azure, Google |
Graphic User Interface (GUI) |
GUI not available; must use 3rd party tools |
GUI is available; web interface |
Load Balancing |
No auto load balancing, but port exposure for external load balance services |
Horizontal scaling & load balancing |
Logging and Monitoring Tool |
No monitoring out-of-box, use 3rd party integrations |
Built-in tool for logging and monitoring, 3rd party integrations |
Networking |
Multi-layered overlay network with peer-to-peer distribution among hosts |
Flat peer-to-peer connections between pods and nodes |
Storage Volume Sharing |
Shares storage with other container |
Shares storage within the same Pod |
Updates & Rollbacks |
Rolling updates and service health monitoring |
Automated rollouts & rollbacks |